{"id":277,"date":"2011-03-21T08:05:56","date_gmt":"2011-03-21T08:05:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.smtec.net\/new\/?page_id=277"},"modified":"2019-04-16T18:12:04","modified_gmt":"2019-04-16T16:12:04","slug":"training-high-living-low","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.smtec.net\/en\/products\/altitrainer\/bibliography-altitrainer\/training-high-living-low\/","title":{"rendered":"Training high-living low: changes of aerobic performance and muscle structure"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Int J Sports Med. 2001 Nov;22(8):579-85.<\/p>\n<h2>Training high&#8211;living low: changes of aerobic performance and muscle structure with training at simulated altitude.<\/h2>\n<p>Geiser J, Vogt M, Billeter R, Zuleger C, Belforti F, Hoppeler H.<\/p>\n<p>Institut de Physiologie, Universit\u00e9 de Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.<\/p>\n<p>This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that endurance  training in hypoxia is superior to training of the same intensity in  normoxia. To avoid adaptation to hypoxia, the subjects lived under  normoxic conditions when not training. A secondary objective of this  study was to compare the effect of high-  vs. moderate-intensity  training on aerobic performance variables. Thirty-three men without  prior endurance training underwent a cycle ergometer training of 6  weeks, 5 d\/week, 30 minutes\/d. The subjects were assigned to 4 groups,  N-high, N-low, H-high and H-low based on the training criteria normoxia  (N; corresponding to a training altitude of 600 m), vs. hypoxia (H;  training altitude 3850 m) and intensity (high; corresponding to 80% and  low: corresponding to 67% of VO2max). VO2max measured in normoxia  increased between 8.5 to 11.1%, independent of training altitude or  intensity. VO2max measured in hypoxia increased between 2.9  and 7.2%.  Hypoxia training resulted in significantly larger increases than  normoxia training. Maximal power that subjects could maintain over a  thirty-minute period (measured in normoxia or hypoxia) increased from  12.3 &#8211; 26.8% independent of training altitude. However, subjects  training at high intensity increased performance more than subjects  training at a low intensity. Muscle volume of the knee-extensors as  measured by magnetic resonance imaging increased significantly in the  H-high group only (+ 5.0%). Mitochondrial volume density measured by  EM-morphometry in biopsy samples of m. vastus lat. increased   significantly in all groups with the highest increase seen in the H-high  group (+ 59%). Capillary length density increased significantly in the  H-high group only (+ 17.2%). The main finding of this study is that in  previously untrained people, training in hypoxia while living at low  altitude increases performance in normoxia to the same extent as  training in normoxia, but leads to larger increases of aerobic  performance variables when measured under hypoxic conditions. Training  intensity had no effect on the gain of VO2max. On the level  of skeletal  muscle tissue, the combination of hypoxia with high training intensity  constitutes the most effective stimulus for increasing muscle oxidative  capacity.<\/p>\n<p>PMID: 11719893 [PubMed &#8211; indexed for MEDLINE]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Int J Sports Med. 2001 Nov;22(8):579-85. Training high&#8211;living low: changes of aerobic performance and muscle structure with training at simulated altitude. Geiser J, Vogt M, Billeter R, Zuleger C, Belforti F, Hoppeler H. Institut de Physiologie, Universit\u00e9 de Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland. This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that endurance training in hypoxia is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":124,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":{"0":"post-277","1":"page","2":"type-page","3":"status-publish","5":"entry"},"featured_image_src":null,"featured_image_src_square":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.smtec.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.smtec.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.smtec.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.smtec.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.smtec.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=277"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.smtec.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/277\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":756,"href":"https:\/\/www.smtec.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/277\/revisions\/756"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.smtec.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/124"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.smtec.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}